<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP RIA SDK by Adobe - Object Mapping Examples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/</link>
	<description>Informtation on Flex, Flash, ColdFusion, and general RIA web develoment.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Renaun Erickson</title>
		<link>http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/comment-page-1/#comment-7460</link>
		<dc:creator>Renaun Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/#comment-7460</guid>
		<description>Yeah, loop over the recordset and create an array of VO's.  There are pros and cons for both methods.  On con of a SQL is also its pro, that is you don't have to define anything if the table columns change its passed along without changing any server side code.  You would still have to change the UI code as the column names change.  

Renaun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, loop over the recordset and create an array of VO&#8217;s.  There are pros and cons for both methods.  On con of a SQL is also its pro, that is you don&#8217;t have to define anything if the table columns change its passed along without changing any server side code.  You would still have to change the UI code as the column names change.  </p>
<p>Renaun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dehats</title>
		<link>http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/comment-page-1/#comment-7452</link>
		<dc:creator>dehats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://renaun.com/blog/2006/10/10/110/#comment-7452</guid>
		<description>This is pretty cool, but most of the time I do not return typed objects in my services. Instead, I return a recordset from a MySQL query to flash. The point would be map the objects listed in this recordset into flash object. How could that be possible? The only way I see is to parse the recordSet and 'manually' cast them to flash Object. Or did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool, but most of the time I do not return typed objects in my services. Instead, I return a recordset from a MySQL query to flash. The point would be map the objects listed in this recordset into flash object. How could that be possible? The only way I see is to parse the recordSet and &#8216;manually&#8217; cast them to flash Object. Or did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
